a minor thing. which do you prefer?
(defn blah [x y & zs] ...) , or, (defn blah [x y zs] ...) clojure core usually uses the first form. assoc, conj and so forth I have used this because it seems nicer for the caller (blah x y z1 z2 z3) rather than (blah x y [z1 z2 z3]) However, if you regularly use this you end up with apply calls all over the place. so, (defn other-blah [x & zs] ...) (defn blah [x y & zs] ... (apply other-blah x zs)) If you use the second form you can pass straight through - which seems to decrease code noise. (defn other-blah [x zs] ...) (defn blah [x y zs] ... (other-blah x zs)) and looks better to me. Dave -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
