Very cool. Great looking doc! I just installed LaTeX and TeXworks so it's off to play. (Other than incanter I already have the rest working, including nrepl - though I have to start up nrepl with nrepl-jack-in. Is that what you were planning on doing? It would be cool to have it launched by the first compile!).
On Sunday, March 3, 2013 6:03:51 PM UTC-5, greg r wrote: > > Here's a little project I worked on: > > https://github.com/Greg-R/incanterchartcustom > > I'm just now learning git, so I hope the files are intact in the > repository. I cloned to another machine and they appear to be OK. > > The Incanter chart PDF document shows what is possible with regard to > documenting code and showing a nice export result. > The repository also includes the source .org file. In theory, if you have > everything set up correctly you can reproduce the > PDF document exactly. Since it is generating PDF charts, there are lots > of side-effects and whatever directory you are running > in will get filled up with the chart files. I used LaTeX snippets within > the org file to include the chart graphics in the exported tex > file and thus the eventual PDF. > > I don't use C-c C-e p. This doesn't always work, and I prefer C-c C-e l > which exports the .tex file only. I open the .tex file with > the Texworks application which has worked really well for me for editing > LaTeX documents. Texworks has the ability to jump between > the PDF and the .tex file and vice-versa, which makes troubleshooting much > easier. > > I did a bunch of data processing for work using org, Clojure, and Incanter > to produce reports in PDF. I created several Leiningen projects > to attack various aspects of the data manipulation. Then within Clojure > code blocks in org, the various namespaces are used to process > data at the appropriate points in the document. None of the output was > inserted directly into the org file. That turned out to be impractical > as some of the generated documents were hundreds of pages long. The > Clojure/Incanter code chunks generated .tex files which were included > in the exported output via LaTeX code blocks. Really in this case the > org-babel system operated more as a document/code organizer than > as a programming system. But what an organizer it is!!! I saved > hundreds, maybe thousands of man hours of manual document generating. > > There were several technologies to learn to get it all to work in harmony: > > Clojure > Incanter > Emacs (24.2) (including some Elisp in the .emacs file) > org > babel > Leiningen > LaTeX > Texworks > nrepl (this will require some extra stuff in the .emacs file to get babel > to work) > > It took a lot of work, but I think the org-babel system is really worth it! > > Regards, > Greg > > On Saturday, March 2, 2013 11:52:07 PM UTC-5, Mark C wrote: >> >> Worked like a charm. Thanks! >> >> Babel is fun. I really like the idea of being able to code in multiple >> languages in one document - and have return values from one feed another. >> And I just found out you can include TeX too - just starting to play with >> that. I'd love to hear more about how you use clojure and org mode together. >> >> Mark >>> >>> >>> -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
