On Feb 28, 2013, at 17:17 , AtKaaZ <atk...@gmail.com> wrote: > According to this, can a vector have keys that are not numbers? like :a , if > not, then wouldn't it make more sense that > (contains? [:a :b :c] :a) would throw ? It's probably just me.
This is a reasonable point, and one I haven't seen made before. The only problem I can see with throwing an exception is that one might sometimes wish to deal with associative containers in a generic fashion, and thus end up asking a vector if it contains a keyword or a string without doing so explicitly. In that case you'd not want it to throw an exception any more than the other associative collection types would. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
