Performance at doing what? why? what are your requirements and what is 
important to you?

Your question is simple but can generate extensive debate. Don't expect a 
yes/no answer.

See this extensive discussion and examples: 
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/clojure/byHO-9t6X4U/discussion

it's funny how the phrase "java-like performance" is now used as a moniker 
for "fast". when Java came out the phrase was "c-like performance". when C 
came out, probably "assembler-like" ......its even faster if you build it 
in hardware too... just maybe not flexible in the way you would like.

Dave


On Friday, 1 March 2013 15:35:16 UTC+11, yizhen wei wrote:
>
> I just start learning clojure recently. 
>
> So I was looking for some performance related post on the internet, and 
> found some optimization tips, "fast" clojure code and so on. Which lead to 
> the question above.
> It seems like most of the time we have to write longer, more java-like 
> code (which I found less readable to java equivalence) to catch up java's 
> speed. 
> Is that just the trade-off we need to make in order to type less character?
>
> What is the difference in performance between "true" clojure (without 
> using type hint or other java stuffs) and java?
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to