Great, thanks! So if one is an object and one is a primitive is one of these not true?
user=> (type seed1) java.lang.Long user=> (type 25214903917) java.lang.Long Cheers, John. On Wednesday, February 20, 2013 11:44:44 PM UTC, Herwig Hochleitner wrote: > > I agree that unchecked-multiply should do an unchecked multiply, even when > faced with objects. Going to bring that up on clojure-dev. > > A workaround: (unchecked-multiply (long seed1) 0x5DEECE66D) > > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
