Oh, yes please. This looks very interesting.

Where can I vote? :P

The more CLJ/CLJS code I write the more I miss a straightforward way to 
share code. Even with cljx or cljsbuild crossovers its still a workarround.



On Saturday, February 16, 2013 7:20:45 PM UTC+1, David Nolen wrote:
>
> I've only glanced at it but Roman's patch looks pretty straightforward, it 
> should be pretty simple to port to tools.reader if the tools.reader folks 
> are OK with this approach.
>
> I think the reason it has stalled is that there been some pushback on that 
> design thread. I don't really share any of the concerns nor like any of the 
> alternate designs expressed there. Feature Expression are simple, have 
> worked well for CL, and require minimal amount of effort to implement. The 
> kinds of hacks that are being used due to the lack of Feature Expression 
> the wild are needlessly complex and the sooner we have something the better.
>
> I wrote the last email pretty quickly - we would need those patches 
> accepted into 1.6 for this to work. I have spoken to Rich briefly in person 
> about this at TechMesh and he didn't seem to share the concerns expressed 
> in the design thread either. So my fingers are crossed that 1.6 arrives 
> fairly quickly with Feature Expression support.
>
> Probably the best thign to do would be to move Roman's CLJ patch to a CLJ 
> JIRA patch and vote it up.
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Mimmo Cosenza 
> <mimmo....@gmail.com<javascript:>
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi David,
>> do you think that with some guidance from few cli/cljs gurus the effort 
>> could be shared with less experienced clojurist ? Or it's more efficient to 
>> let those gurus to make a step ahead by themselves?
>>
>> mimmo
>>
>> On Feb 16, 2013, at 5:53 PM, David Nolen <dnolen...@gmail.com<javascript:>> 
>> wrote:
>>
>> I personally think the CL feature expression approach is satisfactory. 
>> I'd like to see this get into 1.6. It's likely that ClojureScript will 
>> switch to tools.reader in order to get more accurate information for source 
>> maps, so perhaps we can move more quickly if we just implement it there.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Mimmo Cosenza 
>> <mimmo....@gmail.com<javascript:>
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>> the more I learn cli/cljs the more I find myself in looking for 
>>> libraries running on both sides of a clojurean web app. hiccup/valip, c2, 
>>> enliven/encofus, just to name few of them. 
>>>
>>> Is there a kind of agreement on which approach to follow to solve the 
>>> features  expression problem. I already used the leon-cljsbuild workaround 
>>> (i.e. :crossovers option) and cljx feature approach. 
>>>
>>> I just read about feature expression problem here: 
>>> http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/Feature+Expressions
>>> The last discussion is dated july 2012. Cljs, by attracting people 
>>> coming from the front-end side too and by freeing the back-end guys from js 
>>> programming, is growing fast and my personal opinion is that there should 
>>> be a move toward a decision regarding the sharing of code between cli and 
>>> cljs. 
>>>
>>> Is there any advance in this direction? 
>>>
>>> My best
>>>
>>> mimmo
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>>> your first post.
>>> --- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "ClojureScript" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to clojurescrip...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>>> To post to this group, send email to clojur...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
>>> .
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript?hl=en.
>>>  
>>>  
>>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>> your first post.
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "ClojureScript" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to clojurescrip...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to clojur...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
>> .
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript?hl=en.
>>  
>>  
>>
>>
>>  -- 
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>> your first post.
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "ClojureScript" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to clojurescrip...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to clojur...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
>> .
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript?hl=en.
>>  
>>  
>>
>
>

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to