You can increase the chances of generating discussion by boiling down both the relevant content of paper and your program to a minimal, self-contained form.
Cheers - Victor On Friday, February 15, 2013 4:05:09 PM UTC+1, thattommyhall wrote: > > A few months ago I reread Simon Peyton Joneses article on STM in the > Beautiful Code book and decided to try and translate it into clojures > STM > > See the paper here http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/74063/beautiful.pdf > > He says 'Atomic blocks as we have introduced them so far are utterly > inadequate to coordinate concurrent programs. They lack two key > facilities: blocking and choice' so I guess the implication is > Clojures STM is inferior, any thoughts? > > I had to use a constraint on a ref and try/catch to get the same > effect (though I hate using exceptions for control flow it does seem > to work) > > https://github.com/thattommyhall/santa-claus/blob/master/src/santa/core.clj > > I think a better solution might be had using watchers, how would you do > it? > Any good links explaining differences in the STMs? > > Cheers, > Tom > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
