Thanks for the replies. I'm not the owner of what the official namespace should be, so perhaps I'll just clj-xxx and I can always stop using that and change with a major release milestone. Clearly too much thought has gone into this already, and there doesn't appear to be a problem with people using clj-xxx on their own.
On Tuesday, February 12, 2013 7:51:44 PM UTC-5, Jim Klucar wrote: > > I have a library that I'm getting ready to push to github / clojars and > had a question about the naming of it. During development I called it > clojure-xxx, where xxx is the application it interacts with. This is mostly > because I didn't want to think of something clever. At any rate I'd like to > know if that naming convention would be frowned upon because it isn't > coming from the official clojure dev group. > > Thanks, > Jim > > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
