In these examples, the map/record is freshly created each time through the
loop, so caching should not be a factor.

In fact, later in the thread, AtKaaZ posted an example which demonstrated
his timing results when computing the hash repeatedly on the same object.
Oddly, the performance of hashing on maps got* worse *when repeatedly
hashing the same object (records were unaffected), implying that it was
taking more time to retrieve the cached hash than to just compute it from
scratch -- very strange.

--Mark

On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Paul Stadig <p...@stadig.name> wrote:

> On Sunday, February 3, 2013 1:07:41 AM UTC-5, puzzler wrote:
>>
>> I just went through the process of converting my map-based program over
>> to records, hoping it would improve speed.  Much to my dismay, it actually
>> slowed my program down substantially.  With some profiling, I discovered
>> that one possible explanation is that (at least in RC4) hashing of records
>> is about 60x slower than their map-based counterpart.
>>
>> (defrecord A [x y])
>> => (time (dotimes [n 10000000] (hash {:x "a" :y 3})))
>> "Elapsed time: 90.631072 msecs"
>> => (time (dotimes [n 10000000] (hash (A. "a" 3))))
>> "Elapsed time: 5549.788311 msecs"
>>
>> Any thoughts about why this is the case?
>>
>
> There was a change for 1.5 to cache hasheq for maps
> https://github.com/clojure/clojure/commit/d77489d3ce912c177fe288a6f399a5c1da6683dbbut
>  the same is not done for defrecords. That is why maps are so much
> faster than records.
>
>
> Paul
>
>  --
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to