Aha, yep, whoops. --Aaron
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Alan Malloy <a...@malloys.org> wrote: > On Wednesday, January 16, 2013 11:17:41 AM UTC-8, Aaron Cohen wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Frank Siebenlist > <frank.si...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Thanks for the confirmation. >>> >>> I know that destructuring is supported in protocols as I'm using with >>> much pleasure - kind of assumed it would work as it wasn't documented not >>> to work ;-) >>> >> >> I don't believe this is true. You may think it is working, but you >> probably are just ending up with a function that has a parameter named "&". >> >> https://groups.google.com/**forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/** >> clojure/HyoSBEfEF4w<https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/clojure/HyoSBEfEF4w> >> >> > He said destructuring is working (which is true), not that varargs are > working (which would not be true). > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
