Hi. On Wednesday, January 16, 2013 10:20:36 PM UTC+2, David Nolen wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Timo Westkämper > <timo.we...@mysema.com<javascript:> > > wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> >> On Wednesday, January 16, 2013 9:56:39 PM UTC+2, David Nolen wrote: >>> >>> Ok. But at that point can't you just process the type environment with >>> Clojure code? >> >> >> But I get them out with replacements, is there any way to avoid this? >> > > This is what I was asking. You want them reify differently. In this case > you want the lvars left alone and not converted into symbols right? >
Yes, you are right. At least I want to try what the performance impact would be. Br, Timo > > David > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
