Thanks for all of the feedback and suggestions, everyone. To clear one 
thing up, I'm working at an early-stage SF startup, so the alternatives are 
along the lines of Ruby/Python/Node, not Java. That said, I think these 
arguments are great -- I'll definitely share them with team.

Cheers,
David

On Monday, January 7, 2013 3:02:37 PM UTC-8, David Jacobs wrote:
>
> Hey guys,
>
> As someone who's written Clojure for a couple of years now, I would love 
> to convince my new company to build our platform using Clojure from the 
> start. Clojure is certainly a possibility for our small team, but a few 
> questions will have to be answered before I can convince everyone that 
> Clojure is worth using:
>
> 1. Would it be harder to hire if we built our apps with Clojure? More 
> specifically: Hiring for people who know about or already love Clojure/FP 
> is certainly a nice filter for talent, but is it too stringent of a filter? 
> What percentage of the Clojure community wants to code Clojure 
> professionally but isn't right now? Do we have metrics on that?
>
> 2. What are good examples of complex domains that have been tackled with 
> Clojure web apps and API layers?
>
> 3. What major road blocks have teams discovered at the edges of Clojure 
> (keeping in mind that perhaps several of these problems could be solved 
> using native Java calls)?
>
> What other tips do you have for convincing an employer that Clojure makes 
> good business sense? (Of course I've already told them about 
> domain-tailored abstractions, containing complexity, the ease of data 
> manipulation with a functional language, etc.)
>
> Best,
> David
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to