> I would not rely on this behavior. Follow Clojure's property access conventions.
Sorry to dig this up again - would just like to clarify: The idiomatic way of accessing something like `window.location.pathname` then would be (aget js/window "location" "pathname"), or nested .- accesses, correct? I know things with Cljs are developing quickly and I keep seeing the `js/window.location.pathname` form pop up (including in Clojurescript's samples/twitterbuzz/src/twitterbuzz/anneal.cljs), so just wanted to double check. Assuming the latter form is indeed incorrect, any chance of adding a compiler warning to start dissuading people from using it? Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
