Jozef,
How do you achieve that?
Thanks,
Ambrose
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Jozef Wagner <jozef.wag...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I use it in Clojurescript for a custom tuple type.
>
> For small number of items, deftypes are way faster to create and access
> than PersistentVectors. I use tuple type e.g. for returning multiple values
> from a function. Implementing #[] allowed me to have a compact syntax for
> creating and destructuring such tuples.
>
> (defn foo [a b]
> #[(+ a b) (- a b) (* a b)])
>
> (defn foo []
> (let [#[plus minus times] (foo 1 2)]
> (str "bla bla" plus "blaah" minus)))
>
> JW
>
> On Friday, December 28, 2012 11:15:52 PM UTC+1, vemv wrote:
>>
>> I was just wondering - given that we have the #() and #{} literals, why
>> not a #[] as well? Queues look like a good fit.
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
