On Dec 19, 2012, at 11:57 AM, Wm. Josiah Erikson wrote: > I think this is a succinct, deterministic benchmark that clearly > demonstrates the problem and also doesn't use conj or reverse.
Clarification: it's not just a tight loop involving reverse/conj, as our previous benchmark was. It's our real application but with deterministic versions of all of the "random" functions, and while the project includes some calls to reverse and conj I don't think they're playing a big role here. Almost all of the time here is spent evaluating a Push program that just does a lot of integer addition and consing. As far as I can tell all of the consing is done with "cons" explicitly, and not conj.... although maybe I'm missing something, and I'm saying this only from looking at our code, not the Clojure libraries. -Lee -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
