I wouldn't say that it should not have been added since its presence isn't harming anything. You could say, though, that rarely anyone would realize something was missing if Clojure didn't have the STM.
On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 9:50:31 AM UTC+1, john wrote: > > So is the bottom line: STM Should have not been added to clojure ( > because it is not pratical) > > Many Grettings > John > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
