Is there a list of features that you'd like to implement that core.logic 
doesn't have yet?

On Tuesday, 11 December 2012 00:52:24 UTC-5, David Nolen wrote:
>
> core.logic is still pretty young - some (many?) Prolog niceties may not be 
> present. Don't know until you try ;)
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:29 AM, JvJ <kfjwh...@gmail.com <javascript:>>wrote:
>
>> I have some code that uses Prolog, but I want to get rid of the native 
>> dependencies inherent in SWI Prolog/JPL.
>>
>> If I were to switch to core.logic, what would I lose and what would I 
>> gain? 
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>> your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to