Paul, That is exactly what I was driving at, with a slight difference. Pryxis takes an existing program with all the extra code and makes it faster. I would like to build new applications, and I don't even want to build the "extra" code to begin with. Naively speaking, a system that was built with primitives that were conducive to a partition graph program-analysis (from the Pryxis article) or similar, may even have more performance gains.
I have studied a program analysis in the past, and it may be too difficult to do a similar analysis to start with. But at least I would like to have code annotations that would direct the code translation. The system could have a translation tool-set such that anyone could build their own translation to their favorite technology. I have a few ideas about what primitives I'd like but I wanted to hear what others have to say. I do very much appreciate the link, I'll definitely take a deep look at Pryxis. On Tuesday, December 11, 2012 9:09:20 AM UTC-6, Paul deGrandis wrote: > > I would take a look at MIT's Pyxis for help. The publications and work > sounds very similar to what you're shooting for: > > http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2012/making-web-applications-more-efficient-0831.html > > Paul > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en