Paul,

That is exactly what I was driving at, with a slight difference. Pryxis 
takes an existing program with all the extra code and makes it faster. I 
would like to build new applications, and I don't even want to build the 
"extra" code to begin with. Naively speaking, a system that was built with 
primitives that were conducive to a partition graph program-analysis (from 
the Pryxis article) or similar, may even have more performance gains.

I have studied a program analysis in the past, and it may be too difficult 
to do a similar analysis to start with. But at least I would like to have 
code annotations that would direct the code translation. The system could 
have a translation tool-set such that anyone could build their own 
translation to their favorite technology. I have a few ideas about what 
primitives I'd like but I wanted to hear what others have to say.

I do very much appreciate the link, I'll definitely take a deep look at 
Pryxis.

On Tuesday, December 11, 2012 9:09:20 AM UTC-6, Paul deGrandis wrote:
>
> I would take a look at MIT's Pyxis for help.  The publications and work 
> sounds very similar to what you're shooting for:
>
> http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2012/making-web-applications-more-efficient-0831.html
>
> Paul
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to