I disagree...
One of the nice things about clojrue is that, at tis hear, lies the
'equiv' operator which is basically the 'egal' fn as defined by Baker
[1993] [Equal rights for functional objects or the mroe things change
the more they stay the same]. When using '=' with data-structures you
are essentially comparing values and not types.
To come back to your example, both are sequential seqs that contain the
same values in the same order. Why shouldn't they be equal? Clojure
would not be the language we all love, if they weren't equal...
Jim
On 03/10/12 06:24, Larry Travis wrote:
What is the rationale for this?
user> (= [1 2 3 4] '(1 2 3 4))
true
I was quite surprised when this turned out to be the cause of a bug in
a function I am constructing. Vectors and lists differ so
substantially in their implementation and in their behavior that a
vector and a list should not be considered "equal" just because they
contain the same elements in the same order.
--Larry
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
