The full sentence is this:
Syntax-quote (`, note, the "backquote" character), Unquote (~) and
Unquote-splicing (~@)
It looks like perhaps someone started writing this:
Syntax-quote (`), Unquote (~) and Unquote-splicing (~@)
and then added some more explanatory text inside the parentheses to emphasize
which quote character it is. I'm not saying it is as good as it can be now,
but I'm not sure this would be much better, as someone is bound to point out
that the ` character is not in parentheses like all the others are on that page:
Syntax-quote ` (note, the "backquote" character), Unquote (~) and
Unquote-splicing (~@)
Andy
On Dec 2, 2012, at 12:49 PM, Otto Allmendinger wrote:
> (I couldn't figure out where to put this so I might as well just post it here)
>
>
> The page says
>
> > Syntax-quote (`
>
> where it should say
>
> > Syntax-quote `(
>
>
> Otto
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
