Thanks for the response. Although ClojureScript/One uses google closure but
the framework only uses it to access browser features and not for how the
application components are organized.

What I don't like about javascript frameworks is that they all have an OO
twist to them that make things more complicated than necessary. Why don't
everybody just use the functional nature of javascript and forget
about malfunctioning object idioms?  well i'm looking for that framework
because I don't have the skills to build my own.

Thanks for the suggesting Marionette. it looks interesting.


On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Taylor Sando <taylor.sa...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Well since Clojurescript, and by extension Clojurescript One was built on
> top of Google Closure, I guess you could use that.  I know the history
> features from Clojurescript One use are a thin layer over the existing
> history features in Google Closure.  The problem with Google Closure is
> that it's extremely verbose, and it never really caught on with Javascript
> developers.  In terms of other Javascript frameworks, I've used a
> combination of Backbone and RequireJS to do things.  During Startup
> Weekend, my group used Marionette, which is a layer over Backbone.
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to