On Nov 20, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Thomas Goossens wrote: > I think it is a bit dull that for every combination [type1 type2] you have to > define an equivalent method for [type2 type1] > > Is there a way to address this problem? perhaps with sets?
According to http://clojure.org/multimethods only vectors work if you want to have a type hierarchy. I wish sets worked, but then you'd have to also have some sort of destructuring mechanism to bind the parameters. ----- Brian Marick, Artisanal Labrador Contract programming in Ruby and Clojure Occasional consulting on Agile Writing /Functional Programming for the Object-Oriented Programmer/: https://leanpub.com/fp-oo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
