Hi all,
I find the proposed function let-> in Clojure 1.5 very useful, but a bit
ugly. The arguments are backwards when compared to vanilla let, and it
doesn't support destructuring where it easily could (which I believe would
be helpful when threading 'state-like' maps, as I find let-> very useful
for).
I'd like to float an alternative implementation which improves on both
these issues. Thoughts?
(defmacro new-let->
"Establishes bindings as provided for let, evaluates the first form
in the lexical context of that binding, then re-establishes bindings
to that result, repeating for each successive form"
[bindings & forms]
(assert (vector? bindings) "binding must be a vector")
(assert (= 2 (count bindings)) "binding vector must contain exactly two
forms")
`(let [~@bindings
~@(interleave (repeat (bindings 0)) (drop-last forms))]
~(last forms)))
(new-let-> [{:keys [foo bar] :as state} {:foo 1 :bar 2}]
(assoc state :foo (inc bar))
(assoc state :bar (inc foo))) ; => {:foo 3, :bar 4}
--
*Alex Nixon*
Software Engineer | SwiftKey
*a...@swiftkey.net** | http://www.swiftkey.net/*
++++++
WINNER - MOST INNOVATIVE MOBILE
APP<http://www.swiftkey.net/swiftkey-wins-most-innovative-app-at-mwc>
- GSMA GLOBAL MOBILE AWARDS 2012
Head office: 91-95 Southwark Bridge Road, London, SE1 0AX TouchType is a
limited company registered in England and Wales, number 06671487.
Registered office: 91-95 Southwark Bridge Road, London, SE1 0AX
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
