On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Moritz Ulrich <mor...@tarn-vedra.de> wrote: > What should :>> do? For me, it looks awfully like the operator mess they > have in Scala and Haskell.
It should do the same thing :>> already does in condp, and that => does in Scheme's cond. -- Ben Wolfson "Human kind has used its intelligence to vary the flavour of drinks, which may be sweet, aromatic, fermented or spirit-based. ... Family and social life also offer numerous other occasions to consume drinks for pleasure." [Larousse, "Drink" entry] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
