On Nov 6, 2012, at 11:48 , Sean Corfield <seancorfi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:34 AM, JvJ <kfjwhee...@gmail.com> wrote: >> There's quite a number of functions like caar, cadr, cadadr, etc. It's >> lengthy to do that in clojure with just first and rest. > > Clojure does have ffirst, fnext, nfirst, nnext tho' - and I'd question > why you'd need to string several of them together... almost sounds > like you'd want different data structures or a more descriptive way to > access data in them? Perhaps vectors and maps and get-in? Don't forget destructuring! I love that Clojure's pervasive destructuring support single-handedly eliminates many of these problems. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
