> > This sounds like a fantastic approach. Do you have any of your thoughts > of how the spec would look like publicly available? (or maybe a github > project) > > It's not in the public currently but I'm hoping to have something together for consumption by Conj (Nov 14th).
At this time, the best supported approach is still protocols, membership functions, contracts, generative testing, and comments - as stated earlier in the thread. Paul -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
