On Tuesday, October 30, 2012 6:48:28 PM UTC-5, David Nolen wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Anthony Rosequist > <anthony....@gmail.com<javascript:> > > wrote: > >> I'm playing around with core.logic, and have this code so far: >> >> https://gist.github.com/3981557 >> > > It might help to understand exactly what kind of output were you expecting. > > David >
Thanks for the quick reply, David. The little bit that I've seen of core.logic has been mind-blowing so far. My code is outputting ([[1 A 0 5] [2 A 0 9] [3 A 0 3]]) now, which is "wrong" because person A is doing all three tasks between times 0 and 3 (and two of the tasks between times 4 and 5). I would expect something like ([[1 A 0 5] [2 *B* 0 9] [3 A *6 9*]]), where person A is performing tasks 1 and 3 (but not simultaneously) and person B is performing task 2. Given any two output vectors, [task1 person1 start1 end1] and [task2 person2 start2 end2], I think I want this to be true: (conde [(!= person1 person2)] [(<=fd start2 start1) (<=fd end2 start1)] [(<=fd end1 start2) (<=fd end1 end2)]) I don't know how to state that this should be true for all combinations of the 3 output vectors. Eventually, I will have a variable number of people and tasks, so I don't want to just hard-code this conde statement 3 times. I've tried using recursion in a defne and I've also tried using doseq, but I couldn't get either to work. This might not even be a good use case for core.logic. I'm just toying with some different ideas. Of course, I can easily change any of the input or output forms if it would make this easier. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
