Clojure's persistent data structures use sharing under the hood. Ergo, so do clojurescript's.
Phil On Oct 23, 2012 8:23 PM, "Raoul Duke" <rao...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:19 PM, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Brian Craft <craft.br...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Does clojurescript have to do full copies on collection types to keep > them > >> immutable? Or is there some nice way to efficiently do immutable > objects in > >> js? > > ClojureScript now implements all of Clojure's persistent data structures. > > hm, uh, that doesn't seem to answer the question, as i read it. :-) > you /could have/ implemented them via slow expensive full copies, or > you could implement them with sharing under the covers. i assume you > mean the latter is true, but it isn't totally clear just from that > sentence. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
