> To work around the issue, = was changed to be in terms of equiv (see the > definitions in [2]). This allows compliance with the Map interface and > prevents (= (Square. 1 :red) (Rope. 1 :red)). > > [1] One idea was to have a hidden key corresponding to the record's type > be visible when using the Map interface; that would cause a great deal of > complexity and was rejected. > [2] > https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/src/jvm/clojure/lang/Util.java > > I see. This does make sense for record. Thanks. I just wish the decision were consistent and so case two would be false too. All these inconsitencies here and there are adding to the mental burden which we hope to reduce when we come to LISP in the first place.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
