It seems you're refering to CLJS-353 - besides supporting a possible Lua backend, it also feels semantically cleaner not to overload array and object access - I'd vote for an additional oget/oset or obj-get/set.
Also, the aget and aset interface have this multi-dimensional support thru the signature: ([array i & idxs] …), and it's hard to imagine multi-dimensional property access on an object… (btw, unless I'm mistaken, the multi-dimensional array support hasn't been implemented yet for make-array and therefor the aget ([array i & idxs] …) implementation doesn't work - can't find a JIRA issue for that) -FrankS. On Oct 16, 2012, at 9:53 PM, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > It may be worth considering adding an oget to complement aget as was > suggesting during ClojureScript/Lua development. > > David > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Evan Mezeske <emeze...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hmm after reading that docstring, /me hopes he didn't just recommend > something for its not-intended purpose.... :) > > > On Tuesday, October 16, 2012 8:29:47 PM UTC-7, FrankS wrote: > Thanks - that works - that was too easy ;-) > > I looked at the docstring before of aget because I remembered vaguely that > that was how it used to work before .- : > > cljs.core/aget - Function > > ([array i] [array i & idxs]) > Returns the value at the index. > > Dismissed it for object-access after reading that… guess we can improve on > the "clarity" of the docstring a little. > > -FS. > > > On Oct 16, 2012, at 8:20 PM, Evan Mezeske <emez...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I think the easiest solution is to use "aget" and "aset". There may be a > > better way, but if so I'm not aware of it. > > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9861485/clojurescript-interop > > > > On Tuesday, October 16, 2012 6:21:45 PM UTC-7, FrankS wrote: > > I understand that you can call js-methods and get properties thru: > > > > (.a-method some-js-object param) > > > > and > > > > (.-a-prop some-js-object) > > > > respectively, but how do you invoke either when you have the > > method/property as a string? > > > > The following doesn't seem to work: > > > > (let [m "a-method" > > dot-m (symbol (str "." m)] > > (dot-m some-js-object)) > > > > or > > > > (let [m "a-prop" > > dot--m (symbol (str ".-" m)] > > (dot--m some-js-object)) > > > > And I cannot find any simple function interface for this. > > > > I must be overlooking something - please… > > > > Thanks, FrankS. > > > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
