Yeah, you probably shouldn't rely on this but I think it will still
work. I have done something similar before when reading from 3
databases simultaneously (3 nested with-connection and
with-query-result calls) and I believe (connection) is only called
once when creating the prepared statement.
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Sean Corfield <seancorfi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No, the inner with-connection binds *db* to db1 so db2 is no longer
> accessible.
>
> This is why c.j.jdbc is getting an API overall that will expose functions
> that accept the connection or the db-spec directly (and the old API will be
> rewritten in terms of the new one for compatibility).
>
> Sean
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:44 PM, gaz jones <gareth.e.jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Can you not simply:
>>
>> (jdbc/with-connection db2
>> (jdbc/with-query-results results
>> query
>> {:result-type :forward-only
>> :fetch-size 1000}
>> (jdbc/with-connection db1
>> ;; read and write?
>> )))
>>
>> ?
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
