On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:46 PM, Frank Siebenlist <frank.siebenl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Interesting project, although I'm still a little unclear about the > "convincing" use cases where you would choose polyfn over protocols... > > Also, how does the polyfn implementation compare to the clojurescript > protocol implementation?
Not sure I could comment on that, since I've never used ClojureScript. The point of polyfns was to separate out the dispatch from the class generation. If you don't care about the class generation, then they would both work just as well. If you need the class generation, then you need protocols. If you need not class generation, then you need polyfns. This is about simpler composable parts. Protocols could conceivably have been built on something like polyfns, adding class generation. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
