On Thursday, September 20, 2012, Alexey Petrushin wrote: > > ... JIRA ... The contributions we've received so far have been stellar - > so I'm inclined to think the "barrier" is an illusion. > > > Yes it would, but by and large the users of ClojureScript are Clojure > users. So we haven't seen much real interest in this yet. > > Basically, what You are saying is - we are fine with the current state > (heavily bounded to Java, JIRA is also used mostly in Java land only) and > absolutelly not interesting in the growth of clojure in alternative > directions >
I don't think I said anything like that at all :) JIRA is water under the bridge. Perhaps Clojure/core will adopt something else one day but currently that's what we have and it hasn't prevented great contributions. As far as losing dependence on the JVM, that would be a fun project but involves significant amounts of work and no one has offered up to lead such an endeavor. In the meantime there are many things to do improve the experience for the current users and these users seem strangely compelled to report issues and patches :) David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
