On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Herwig Hochleitner <hhochleit...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > right now, this works in clojurescript: > > ;; in a file lib/fancy.cljs > (ns lib.fancy) > (defn fun [x] > [:runtime :fun x]) > > ;; in a file lib/fancy.clj > (ns lib.fancy) > (defmacro fun [x] > [:precompiled :fun x]) > > ;; in a file app/core.clj > (ns app.core > (:require > [lib.fancy :as fancy]) > (:require-macros > [lib.fancy :as fancy])) > > (fancy/fun :invokation) > ;; => [:precompiled :fun :invokation] > > (apply fancy/fun [:invokation]) > ;; => [:runtime :fun :invokaton] > > This behavior is perfectly understandable, given the compilation-phase model > of clojurescript. It is also used in cljs.core for math functions et al. > > Now my question is: > > Is this behavior also supported for user code or does it only work > incidentally? > By this I mean using the same alias in :require and :require-macros, and > refer to either of them, depending on usage?
That's how compiler macros are intended to work. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
