Does it make any sense to have a higher-order namespace? For instance, I have a namespace with functions that manipulating data from an arbitrary source, and each function takes a "source" argument. On the mutable state side of things, I require this namespace but partially apply a given source to all its functions.
I recognize this would require all functions in the namespace to have the same first argument, and I probably have the wrong perspective. I come from an OO (Ruby) background and I'm trying to translate ideas (in this case dependency inversion). -- Thomaz -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
