Oh, I understand. Works in ClojureScript as well! I noticed that in this line
(protocols/get [_] 42) One can safely drop the namespace qualification. Thank you very much Matthias - this issue was certainly a blocker for me. On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Matthias Benkard <mulkiat...@gmail.com>wrote: > You have reused a name already bound in the `protocols` namespace. You > cannot bind two things to the same var. > > On the other hand, precisely because namespaces are not complected with > protocol dispatch, you can easily free the `get` identifier for your > purposes by doing exactly what you would do if you wanted to reuse the > identifier in some other way: > > (ns protocols > (:refer-clojure :exclude [get])) > > (defprotocol P (get [_])) > > (ns app) > (defrecord R [] > protocols/P > (protocols/get [_] > 42)) > > You can now call `protocols/get` by namespace qualification (or by > importing it into the current namespace): > > user> (in-ns 'app) > app> (protocols/get (->R)) > 42 > > > Matthias > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
