@dmirylenka Thanks. That is useful to know. On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 3:00 PM, dmirylenka <daniilmirile...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Just 2 cents: > > A name you give to the anonymous function also appears in the stack traces > instead of the things like fn_123_4532, > which is very convenient for debugging. > > On Friday, August 31, 2012 5:52:55 PM UTC+2, Erlis Vidal wrote: >> >> Hi guys, >> >> I've been reading but I'm still confused about the difference between an >> anonymous function with name vs a defn function >> >> (fn my-func1[x] x) >> >> (defn my-func2[x] x) >> >> Thanks, >> Erlis >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
