With regards to reducers, I think it's worth watching one of Rich's own 
talks on this as well:

http://vimeo.com/45561411

On Friday, August 17, 2012 6:29:29 PM UTC-4, Ben Mabey wrote:
>
> On 8/17/12 3:03 PM, Rich Morin wrote: 
> > I took a break from reading "Programming Clojure, 2e" to watch Stuart's 
> > InfoQ interview: 
> > 
> >    Stuart Halloway on Datomic, Clojure, Reducers<
> http://www.infoq.com/interviews/halloway-datomic> 
> >    http://www.infoq.com/interviews/halloway-datomic 
> > 
> > I have a couple of questions which I hope folks can answer... 
> > 
> > Q: Is there an extended treatment of Clojure "data literals"? 
> > 
> > Stuart discussed these, saying that they hit a sweet spot between XML 
> and 
> > JSON. I'd like to see an extended discussion of this topic, but Google 
> is 
> > letting me down. Any suggestions? 
> > 
> > 
>
> I haven't listened to the interview, but he was most likely referring to 
> the new "Reader Literals" (a.k.a. tagged literals) support in 1.4.  The 
> best place to read about this new feature is in the changes.md of 
> clojure: 
>
> https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/changes.md 
>
> I've been using the tagged literal support in my current app and it has 
> been very useful.  I've been exporting streams of events as clojure data 
> structures that I have been replaying in the system at later times 
> (event sourcing).  Being able to represent any arbitrarily object as my 
> own custom literal and have it be read in automatically in a language 
> supported way makes my life a lot easier. :) 
>
> -Ben 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to