On Tuesday, August 14, 2012 3:33:03 PM UTC-5, Sean Corfield wrote: > > > Could you use the extensible reader literal approach? I know the > syntax wouldn't be quite as clean, but if you genuinely need float[] > as well as float values, that might be more convenient in the long > run.
In some instances, there are float[]s, but most often they form part of argument lists. e.g. (foo/bar "eg" (float 0.2f) (float 0.23) (float 0.23) etc other ...) I had thought about the *data-readers* approach for reading in float literals. As you say the syntax is not particularly clean. #myproject/float 3.14 #f 3.14 vs. (float 3.14) vs. 3.14f (proposed) *data-reader* might work great for kernels where I really need float[] though. #kernel [0.12 0.23, 0.12] vs. (float-array [0.12 0.23, 0.12]) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
