I prefer (filter (partial not nil?) coll) as a HOF Le dimanche 12 août 2012 20:46:59 UTC+2, rmarianski a écrit : > > On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 11:22:55AM -0700, Takahiro Hozumi wrote: > > > (filter (partial not nil?) coll) > > You mean (filter (comp not nil?) coll). > > I'm not sure which is more readable, but thanks for Meikel and Alex, I > now > > prefer (remove nil? coll). > > remove is better in this case, but for posterity (comp not nil?) can be > spelled as (complement nil?) > > Robert >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
