I prefer  (filter (partial not nil?) coll)  as a HOF

Le dimanche 12 août 2012 20:46:59 UTC+2, rmarianski a écrit :
>
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 11:22:55AM -0700, Takahiro Hozumi wrote: 
> > > (filter (partial not nil?) coll) 
> > You mean (filter (comp not nil?) coll). 
> > I'm not sure which is more readable, but thanks for Meikel and Alex, I 
> now 
> > prefer (remove nil? coll). 
>
> remove is better in this case, but for posterity (comp not nil?) can be 
> spelled as (complement nil?) 
>
> Robert 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to