> 1. would it be, or is it possible to have something generic like this?
You could use: (def v1 (fn self ([x] (self x [])) ([x r] (conj r x))) > 2. What about anonymous fns? The same idea, just without the "def". (fn call-self ([x] (call-self x 0)) ([x y] ...))) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
