On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Evan Gamble <solar.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > ...oh, and regarding the people who argue we should not use literal syntax > with non-constants, I can only shake my head in wonder. Why on Earth would > anyone seriously propose not using this elegant, concise syntax?
Just to be clear, I'm not arguing the status quo is right - I'd just never thought to use literal syntax for variable stuff so I'd never run into this and was just surprised that folks weren't using 'set' or 'into' to construct sets and maps from variables... This whole discussion is quite fascinating to me, to see the different ways people think about these constructs! -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/ "Perfection is the enemy of the good." -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
