>
> Curious: If you didn't find what you needed in Java's standard class
> library, where else did you go looking for Java libraries?
>

Usually it was just a matter of Googling something like "java rss" if I was
in need of an rss library. Once I found a library which seemed useful and
supported, in this case, ROME <http://rometools.org/> I'd then look for the
maven link on their site or googled "rome maven".  Usually you can find the
link pretty fast, but the mvn repository <http://mvnrepository.com/> also
seems like a could place to check.

Once you find the most recent version you just stick that in your
project.clj file and let lein handle the rest. It isn't an exact process by
any means but it worked well.

One way that seems to me a good way to help projects get more docs is to
> create a fork and add and/or improve existing docstrings. ...
>

 Yeah, when I stated that I found myself digging around on github there's
actually two sides to it. Yeah it was a bummer that there aren't docs on
more libraries, but the flip side of the coin is that it is a testament to
the language that I could actually do so and grok other people's code after
only a few weeks of use.

It seems to me that the 3 major style rules are:
>
> 1. line up args vertically,
> 2. use 2-space indents, and
> 3. let Emacs otherwise do indenting for you.
>
> Minor note: that 3rd rule can be difficult to follow if, say, you're not
> using Emacs. :)


Thank you. One of my big disappointments with the project was that I
couldn't use Emacs working. I've always been awed by some of the
descriptions of emacs lisp editing environments and I wanted to experience
that myself. Unfortunately there is some issue with Windows 7 and file
permissions and I setting up the Emacs side that I could never resolve
through googling. Perhaps it would be worth spending more time to fix, but
I hadn't even used the language and I just wanted to use something that
worked, which for its faults, Eclipse and counterclockwise did.

This sounds like a job for a community-driven cookbook. There's a cookbook
> at http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Clojure_Programming , but I'd always
> figured that wikibooks was for "books", rather than for use as a general
> wiki (please, correct me if I'm wrong here.). There also appears to be a
> cookbook at http://www.gettingclojure.com/cookbook:clojure-cookbook .
>
> It seems to me that a community-driven wiki would be a good place for a
> cookbook (and other misc things) to live. (Personally, I like [gitit](
> http://gitit.net/).
>

 Certainly sounds useful. Here's PEP 8 as an example of what I'm talking
about:
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/

Thanks for your comments.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to