Excerpts from Ben Mabey's message of 2012-07-11 09:08:08 -0700: > About 90% of the time I have used dynamic binding I have regretted it. You > have to worry about binding conveyance (e.g. across threads- although 1.3 > fixed this) and it can allow for harder to reason about code. As a user of > your library I'd prefer a function that I could pass the template in along > with a map of variables to be subbed in. I imagine the other clojure > mustache libraries provide such an API, but I've never used them so I can't > say for sure.
Ok. I think it's easy enough for me to provide a helper function that will fill this behavior in for the dynamic binding, which maybe is the best of both worlds (since I like the idea of allowing flexibility in how you fill the data). Thank you, anyways, for the great comments. Exactly what I was hoping for. -- William <wmor...@masanjin.net> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en