>
> So is there a way to do it cleaner without resorting to using the
> map/implementation (detail) form of protocol extension?
>
Currently, there is no way to get the implementing fns for a type-protocol
point. I doubt there will be soon, since clojure compiles implementations
in a deftype/record or reify directly to java methods on the generated
class.
There is a way, however, to supply fns as implementations for a
type-protocol point, i.e. extend
(extend SomeOps MImp {:someop (memoize (fn [me] ...))})
kind regards
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
