How do you think the conditionals can be removed? On Sunday, July 1, 2012, Vinzent wrote:
> Just an idea: predicate dispatch can be combined with protocols into one > thing, eliminating the need for defrecord-like things at all. Low level > types defined with deftype, higher-level abstractions defined with that > "dynamic protocols" thing. It'd be fun to play with it :) > > > Don't you think the nth implementation is kind of smells bad with all > those nested ifs? How do you feel about "anti-if campaign" [1]? Wouldn't it > be easier to implement nth with interfaces (no predicate dispatch is > required, open by default)? > > Disclaimer: I don't want to criticize your code or something, I'm rather > trying to understand your vision of the problem. It would be fantastic if > you've written a blog post on it. > > [1] - http://www.antiifcampaign.com/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to > clojure@googlegroups.com<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > 'clojure@googlegroups.com');> > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > 'clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com');> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
