On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Weber, Martin S <martin.we...@nist.gov> wrote: > I'm sorry to say, but IMHO you failed to communicate the critical point to > your audience. If your audience keeps failing to grasp the point, and > communicates this failure back by asking the same question..
Perhaps we differ on the matter of audience participation? :) The functions found in the standard library fall out of Clojure's well considered protocol / interface partitions. Don't take my word for it as I already said - examine the protocol / interface partitions yourself. In the end you'll be left with a discussion about *names* (peek vs. last) - not performance, concrete types or anything else. At which point we'll probably agree that it's water under the bridge and it's not going to change. David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
