if you are printing tables using Clojure, you should checkout doric: http://github.com/joegallo/doric
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Jim - FooBar(); <jimpil1...@gmail.com> wrote: > the very first let binding in clojure.inspector/old-table-model should be: > > row1 (some #(when-not (nil? %) %) data) > > instead of > > row1 (first data) > > simply because it will fail if the (first data) returns nil... > > where do we submit minor improvements like this? > > Jim > > > > On 16/06/12 13:26, Jim - FooBar(); wrote: > > It would be nice to have the option to supply the keys to 'inspect-table' > just in case the first element is nil...this is exactly the behaviour of > 'clojure.pprint.print-table' where providing the keys is indeed an option. > Both will fail when the first element is nil but at least 'print-table' > allows us to provide the keys in advance... > > Jim > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- And what is good, Phaedrus, And what is not good— Need we ask anyone to tell us these things? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
