nice catch and point taken...
however the exact same thing would happen if this was a function...it's
just wrong !
Jim
On 14/06/12 19:32, Tassilo Horn wrote:
"Jim - FooBar();"<jimpil1...@gmail.com> writes:
(defmacro in?
"Returns true if colle contains elm, false otherwise."
[colle elm]
`(if (some #{~elm} ~colle) true false))
Except for the complains that this doesn't need to be a macro (which I
agree with), it is also wrong.
user> (in? [nil false] nil)
false
user> (in? [nil false] false)
false
Bye,
Tassilo
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
