That's a good point, it would make the API more idiomatic I suppose. On 2012-06-11, at 01:45 , Baishampayan Ghose wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Dmitri <dmitri.sotni...@gmail.com> wrote: >> The reason I'm using strings for values is to make it easier to work with >> deserialized JSON. Currently I have it running as a service that our >> internal applications send a JSON request and get a PDF document back. > > Internally you can call `name` on the arguments, that way the user can > pass in either a string or a keyword. > > Regards, > BG > > -- > Baishampayan Ghose > b.ghose at gmail.com > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
